For what it's worth, @rebeccawatson, that picture crossed the line. This Tweeter gladly disavows anyone who would draw that.— Skepdigger (@SkepDirt) February 04, 2013
Gals, don't do that. RT “@SkepDirt: Unedited picture of rebeccawatson as an object: skepdirt.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/car… Keep reading SkepDirt!”— Atheism++ (@AtheismPlusPlus) February 04, 2013
#RebeccaWatson claims that awful picture is from skep. community.Does she not know she is featured on encyclopedia dramatica?#Justathought— Elena Gomez (@gbarajas3) February 04, 2013
Hold up! @michaelshermer should not complain bc his criticism is "mild" compared to @rebeccawatson ? Does "Muslima" ring a bell, Rebecca?— (@AmbrosiaX) February 04, 2013
Hey @rebeccawatson , you don't deserve to have gross pictures photoshopped of you. But, they have nothing to do with @michaelshermer . Stop.— (@AmbrosiaX) February 04, 2013
RT @Secular_Steve: BREAKING: #Skepchick #RebeccaWatson gets trolled. OTHER NEWS: M&M's no longer available in the colour red. FINAL …— (@AmbrosiaX) February 04, 2013
Watson is a seventh-rate media-whore.
Maybe lower than that ranking.
But a professional media-whore, nonetheless.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.